<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:12pt"><div>
<meta name="qrichtext" content="1"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><style type="text/css">
p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
</style>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"><!--StartFragment-->> For general consensus I mean you, me, pano, ivan, lindsay... others??</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> Now we are 2 vs 0 :)</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> Plus hearing some opinions from kde-usability staff. I'm interested in</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> their ideas about rekonq :)</p><p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"><br></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">3 vs 0 with Ivan.</p><p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"><br></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> I didn't understand this. If we stop two or three weeks development in</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> master branch (continuing that on multitask one), stabilizing code and</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> releasing a full KDE support rekonq, what's the problem? WebkitKDE is a</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> library, rekonq is an app. They are surely different. And have surely</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> different targets. Perhaps things go smooths and we can release a</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> "multitask 0.3 rekonq", perhaps not. And we have to work a bit more on it.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> That's all!</p><p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"><br></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">Ok.</p><p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"><br></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> No, sorry. QWebView is a window.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"><br></p><p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">QWebView is a QWidget:</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"><span><a target="_blank" href="http://doc.trolltech.com/4.5/qwebview.html">http://doc.trolltech.com/4.5/qwebview.html</a></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"><br></p><p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> And in my first idea about (again, I can</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> be wrong) the tabwidget is in the rekonq main application. the tabs (so,</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> the WebViews) will become separate apps.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"><br></p><p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">Yes it is like that. I don't say we must keep tabwidget in the rekonq_tab process. I say that it is easier to duplicate something compiling and remove after.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"><br></p><p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">> Yes, I was saying just I'm not used to work with dbus..</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"><br></p><p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;">idem :)</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;"><!--EndFragment--></p></div></div><br>
</body></html>