No subject
Fri Apr 17 10:51:14 CEST 2009
porting would actually be rewriting. And don't say this is bad thing, I=
just say this would require a complete rewrite from ground up.<br><br>On t=
he other hand it would be benefit for us and for the community. Generalizat=
ion (of code) is always better and you can't do any better to "not=
repeat yourself" than to use library shared with whole KDE community.=
<br>
<br>This would solve some of our problems:<br>- we won't have to refact=
or anything, because we would be rewriting it anyway<br>- we would get bett=
er modularity<br>- we would implement plugin framework as a "side effe=
ct"<br>
- even better integration with KDE<br><br>This is not easy task but, sounds=
like fun :)<br><br>I've already checked out the code from svn, and beg=
un to hack ;)<br><br>Regards<br>
--00163662e5aeb6ef4b0467e73e4d--
More information about the rekonq
mailing list