Move krunner also to plasma bundle? (was: Re: plasma-framework, kactivities and kactivities-stats: please consider proper de-KF-ication now)

[Friedrich W. H. Kossebau]

Am Sonntag, 5. November 2023, 15:32:21 CET schrieb christoph at cullmann.io:
> On 2023-11-05 15:11, Nate Graham wrote:
> > On 11/5/23 07:09, christoph at cullmann.io wrote:
> >> if we are atm moving stuff, might it make sense to move Baloo, too,
> >> given it only
> >> is usable with the daemon inside Plasma more or less, too?
> >> 
> >> Greetings
> >> Christoph
> > 
> > Baloo is linked by some apps, e.g. Elisa, and I wouldn't like to make
> > them haul in Plasma stuff.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> some applications link to kactivities, too.
> I think it just makes it more clear that this will just work with
> Plasma.
> 
> But I can live with the status quo, too, just thought it would be
> cleaner.

While at it:

would KRunner not also be a good candidate to bundle with Plasma instead of 
KF?  (to repeat some old record :P)

AFAIK the only programs hosting KRunner plugins are Plasma ones, everyone else 
just provides plugins. So similar to Plasma-Frameworks.

Bundling KRunner libraries with Plasma would allow to develop the search/query 
system in-sync, and plugin developers would just expect the plugin API to be 
stable.

Cheers
Friedrich