D24635: feedback kcm: Improve wording and presentation of the user feedback settings

[Nathaniel Graham]

ngraham added a comment.


  In D24635#547820 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D24635#547820>, @apol wrote:
  
  > I understand what you say but I don't think that's even feasible. Does it really make sense that from e.g. KMail you need to ask the Plasma KCM for permission to send feedback?
  >  Furthermore, a KMail user may not even be on Plasma, how would you enable feedback then?
  
  
  The global on/off switch would be in the KCM, which I think is where people would expect it to be. Once it's turned on, then I suppose the settings for whether or not KMail should send feedback would live in KMail (but it could also be visible in a central location, in the KCM). That's my vision for how it should work, at least.

REPOSITORY
  R120 Plasma Workspace

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D24635

To: apol, #plasma
Cc: ngraham, davidedmundson, plasma-devel, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, jraleigh, fbampaloukas, GB_2, ragreen, ZrenBot, alexeymin, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, ahiemstra, mart
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20191016/1872b44a/attachment-0001.html>