DrKonqi and BKO

[David Edmundson]

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:28 AM, René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Sorry if this has already been answered somewhere where I've missed it:
>
> DrKonqi has lost much of its interest (in v5.8.2) due to recent changes in
> BKO. Most of the crashes I've been trying to report via the tool have led
> to rejection because of an overzealous spam filter, and now because there's
> a (new? lowered?) max. limit of 64k characters per comment.
> Evidently an inline backtrace can be much longer than that.
>
> I do agree that it'd be better for readability to put backtraces in an
> attachment;
>

As attachments is awful. You cannot search if it's in an attachment.
Searching is ridiculously important.

Though, you have raised an important issue, lets see if we can fix this
limit first.

David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20161101/929128aa/attachment.html>