KActivities split, 2nd phase
notmart at gmail.com
Tue Feb 2 22:10:42 UTC 2016
On Tuesday 02 February 2016 23:01:38 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > I would prefer it together with the library..
> I do agree, the only reason why I wanted to move it out is that
> kactivities would not be able to be tier1 in that case - the QML
> imports use i18n (this one could be easily removed), kio and kconfig
> (these two are for getting the activity wallpaper - if plasma provided
> wallpapers via d-bus, it would not be a problem).
if the library can confortably be tier1 yes it's important it is.
maybe a kactivities-declarative or kactivities-qml framework?
> > either plasma-desktop/kcms?
> > kio-extras?
> These seem the most convenient places for me as well.
> One thing that needs to be coordinated is the release. On which
> framework version will the next release of plasma and friends depend?
> In that release I could remove non-library parts from kactivities, and
> they will be moved to the agreed locations for that release of plasma.
ouchh, pain, that's similar to what happened with the baloo move.
the problem would be users of an old workspace, updating frameworks and ta-da
the dependencies aren't there anymore.
kinda fear those repos would have to live in frameworks forever? :/
More information about the Plasma-devel