A Plasma Vision draft

[Jens Reuterberg]

In all fairness Thomas mentioned that too :D But we thought "oh computer stuff 
works, lets keep it" plus its a nice catch-all word isn't it... Don't know of 
an alternative to it without adding a lot of extra word faffing tbh. (Anyone 
who knows: HALP!)

During CERN professionals came up as an example of what we wanted to aim to, 
now we may have gone in a tad hard for that (since I like exclusions as a way 
to define ourselves) - either that or we are stuck with "enthusiasts" (which 
means nothing at all) or "hobbyists" (which is not a grand group to be 
connected to when it comes to words I feel - I may be wrong of course these 
are just my reasonings)

On Monday, 4 April 2016 15:04:30 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> On 4 April 2016 at 14:58, Jens Reuterberg <jensreu at kolabnow.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for feedback! :)
> > 
> >> First, it looks very professional, nice :)
> >> one thing tough , is the underline of the words, the red underline may
> >> look
> >> like a spellcheck error (i'm wondering if something else could be used
> >> instead of an underline, like bullets, those icons in small, or just a
> >> background..)
> > 
> > Yes now that you say it it does look like a spelling check going on :D Ok
> > ok this calls for some experimentation. Will edit that
> > 
> > But the text? What do you think about the text?
> 
> I'm not convinced performant is a word although it seems to be used
> for computer jargon
> 
> http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/38945/what-is-wrong-with-the-word
> -performant
> 
> The main part which surprises me is the user profile for professional
> users. I guess you've thought about who that includes and who it
> excludes?  How does it differentiate us from the competition?
> 
> Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> Plasma-devel mailing list
> Plasma-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel