Planning merging the single qqml engine

[Marco Martin]

On Monday 18 May 2015, Ivan Čukić wrote:
> While I'm usually more conservative, I do think that something more
> decisive should be done in this case (and cases like these). While we
> do not want to break everything with each new release (wink wink ghm
> ghm nudge nudge), I don't think we want to support every
> not-still-preferred-approach-of-implementing-something we made before
> indefinitely.

a very crude approach may be maintaining a white list of name+version of the 
applets that needs this, just to make old workspace work for a while and 
eventually removing it

> If there are important 3rd-party plasma 5 applets (are there?) that we
> really need to keep back-compatibility for, I'd propose this:

we should goover kdelook i gues, there should be 5-6 plasmoids there

-- 
Marco Martin