on review process again.. phabricator?
Ben Cooksley
bcooksley at kde.org
Mon Jul 13 09:22:49 UTC 2015
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Ivan Čukić <ivan.cukic at kde.org> wrote:
> One issue from 'many projects sharing the same phab' is that the main
> page gets populated with 'Unbreak now!' issues from other projects.
The main page can probably be customised I suspect. The instance at
https://secure.phabricator.com/ shows feeds of recent activity for
instance, and the Differential and Maniphest pages there contain
personalised variants by default.
>
> Nothing really problematic, but it would be nice if these would be
> filtered on the projects a user is interested on.
>
> Cheers,
> Ivan
Regards,
Ben
>
> On 8 July 2015 at 23:20, Ben Cooksley <bcooksley at kde.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:18 AM, Boudewijn Rempt <boud at valdyas.org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Marco Martin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Some projects are trying out phabricator (looking at kactivities) how do
>>>> they find it?
>>>
>>>
>>> Krita developers, testers and designers all feel Phabricator is pretty fab.
>>> Newbies take to it easiliy. It takes getting used to because it's more than
>>> a reviewboard replacement, it also has project management, task management
>>> and much more.
>>>
>>> The way different projects/repos share the website is a bit of a put-off at
>>> the moment. You don't get kactivities.phabricator.kde.org, but you find all
>>> repos in one website.
>>
>> Unfortunately there is little we can do about this - it, like most
>> software out there, is designed for one project sharing a very closely
>> related group of tasks, repositories, etc. KDE doesn't really fit that
>> pattern anymore, but having multiple instances of it is totally
>> infeasible.
>>
>> I'd like to know more about where this falls down though to see if it
>> can be remedied to a certain extent.
>>
>>>
>>>> can it go more large scale? (more a sysadmin question) If it doesn't have
>>>> big obvious problems I would like to try it on plasma-framework at least. To
>>>> eventually have plasma-workspace et al too, but not yet (at least I would
>>>> never want gerrit on those projects..)
>>>
>>>
>>> Boudewijn
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ben
>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Plasma-devel mailing list
>>> Plasma-devel at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> Plasma-devel mailing list
>> Plasma-devel at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Cheerio,
> Ivan
>
> --
> While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words
> Dying to believe in what you heard
> I was staring straight into the shining sun
> _______________________________________________
> Plasma-devel mailing list
> Plasma-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
More information about the Plasma-devel
mailing list