Finding all the Plasma Bugs

[David Edmundson]

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Martin Gräßlin <mgraesslin at kde.org> wrote:

> On Friday 23 January 2015 02:41:23 David Edmundson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Christoph Feck <cfeck at kde.org> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 20 January 2015 22:34:18 David Edmundson wrote:
> > > > I was trying to triage some of the wider Plasma bugs and realised
> > > > that I didn't have a full list of bugzilla components [...]
> > >
> > > Thank you for taking care of bugs. Could you please comment on
> > > "kscreensaver/locker-qml" component? Is this the correct place to
> > > report bugs for the Plasma 5 locker?
> >
> > That is a very good question. It looks like I missed that on my original
> > list. There's some valid looking Plasma 5 bug reports in here that I was
> > missing.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > We currently have these bugs scattered amongst:
> >  - ksmserver
> >  - plasmashell/lookandfeel
> >  - kscreensaver/locker-qml
> >
> > would be good to consolidate it and close the rest.
> >
> > Any preference?
>
> I would say the kscreensaver product gets closed, the still valid bugs are
> moved to a new component in ksmserver.


Fine with me.
I've created a component, we can at least move the Plasma 5 bugs there and
add a comment in kscreensaver.

(Once 4.11 goes EOL the no longer
> applying bugs can be closed).
>
>
I don't see why we should have to wait. If no-one is going to fix it, there
is no point keeping a bug open.

I see this EOL thing as a time for which we should keep on top of all
security issues and anything critical but nothing more.

I guess that's a topic for an exciting flamewar another day.

David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20150123/0544b481/attachment.html>