RFC: Should our first release depend on Qt 5.3 or not?

[Martin Gräßlin]

On Thursday 08 May 2014 12:44:29 Martin Klapetek wrote:
> Hey all,
> 
> Qt 5.3 is out on 20th May; should we hard depend on it in plasma with the
> first release?
> 
> Given we've all been using Qt from git, I think this makes much sense as
> it's well tested with that, as opposed to Qt 5.2.x.
> 
> Should the decision be against it, we should checkout Qt 5.2 and start
> testing plasma with that about now.
> 
> Your opinions?

+1 for Qt 5.3
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20140508/b4dfc477/attachment.sig>