RFC: Should our first release depend on Qt 5.3 or not?
Aleix Pol
aleixpol at kde.org
Thu May 8 10:53:06 UTC 2014
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Martin Klapetek
<martin.klapetek at gmail.com>wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Qt 5.3 is out on 20th May; should we hard depend on it in plasma with the
> first release?
>
> Given we've all been using Qt from git, I think this makes much sense as
> it's well tested with that, as opposed to Qt 5.2.x.
>
> Should the decision be against it, we should checkout Qt 5.2 and start
> testing plasma with that about now.
>
> Your opinions?
>
> Cheers
> --
> Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plasma-devel mailing list
> Plasma-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
>
>
+1 to Qt 5.3. It adds many improvements that make Plasma Next much more
bearable.
Aleix
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20140508/d5a34432/attachment.html>
More information about the Plasma-devel
mailing list