Release schedule for Plasma Next

[Martin Graesslin]

On Wednesday 29 January 2014 17:09:32 Eike Hein wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:36:22 Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > Do we really need this one week in between? Just tag and release on the
> > day
> > of feature freeze. It's the responsibility of all of us to not screw up.
> > Why add to the release schedule the possibility to screw up? We are giving
> > out the hint that "it doesn't matter if you push your feature have
> > finished, you have another week to fix it". We want an always releasable
> > master, thus we don't want people to continue to do that. Features should
> > be pushed if they are done and not half finished.
> 
> FWIW, I don't feel as strongly about this as about the Beta->Alpha thing,
> so if you all disagree with the week-long padding I don't mind much. In
> general I even agree with you, except I think "always releasable master"
> is something you achieve with the first release, not before.

depends on how much we value the stabilization before :-) I think it's doable 
if we want to and try to do so.

Cheers
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20140129/1559e679/attachment.sig>