plasma workspace integration for akonadi

Thomas Pfeiffer colomar at
Sat Feb 8 20:08:06 UTC 2014

On Saturday 08 February 2014 06:46:35 Martin Klapetek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Heena Mahour <heena393 at> wrote:
> > Re implementation of lion mail is required in any case .
> > It is currently using data engine which is not the required tool as it
> > should use models throughout and all is based on QGraphicsView .
> DataEngines are just fine for Plasma Next, actually even the clock applet
> is directly using a DataEngine. There was an architectual change in teh DEs
> that makes them use models, but they are still fully supported option.
> > It is architecturally broken and not yet finished as was suggested by
> > Sebas .
> > So , it would be a nice idea for that I think .
> Remember that GSoC is about 3 months of full-time (payed) work, porting
> one-two plasmoids can be a couple weekends project at most...

Though it was already usable in practice, sebas never considered Lionmail as 
"finished", so finishing it means more than merely porting it.

More information about the Plasma-devel mailing list