private import names
Marco Martin
notmart at gmail.com
Wed Sep 25 10:45:56 UTC 2013
On Wednesday 25 September 2013 12:17:52 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > so something like private.org.kde.plasma.widgetname or
> > .org.kde.private.plasma.widgetname
>
> The leading . is purposeful?
ah, no ;)
> > the first would take a "private" at the first level, that maybe is not too
> > nice, but the nice part is that it would always be
> > private.$widgetpluginname that has some beauty (and easy filtering) in it
>
> I'm cool with private at the beginning, I actually don't care too much, as
> long as it's consistent. This has been spooking around my mind since I ship-
> it'ed Bhushan's Icon port, I just like to get rid of this nagging feeling
> that we have to change something there. And I'm running into the exact same
> in the systray port.
maybe could make sense asking in kde-core-devel as well, since i would like
having other kde apps, at leastthe main ones following the scheme as well..
--
Marco Martin
More information about the Plasma-devel
mailing list