PotD Headers

Thu May 16 08:37:14 UTC 2013

On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 11:27:35 David Narvaez wrote:
> to develop PotD providers? If so, then we need to take those decisions
> (who, how, when) in some order, and face the matter below:

that issue is irrelevant if we do not use a C++ API for that. please see my 
email in this thread for why a scripted approach here is going to be a better 
solution.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20130516/bd911902/attachment.sig>