PotD Headers

[David Narvaez]

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Martin Gräßlin <mgraesslin at kde.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 May 2013 08:40:06 Marco Martin wrote:
> > that would make it a public library, with the promise of more quality
> > and
> > absolute binary stability that this brings..
> > would be fine,.. as long someone commits to maintain a library with such
> > a
> > promise (that would probably require some refactor to be ready, such as
> > being all based on dpointers)
> as it's in kdeplasma-addons the binary stability should not matter as long
> as
> the so version is increased with each release.

Well, let's backtrack a bit: do we want to make it easier for people
to develop PotD providers? If so, then we need to take those decisions
(who, how, when) in some order, and face the matter below:

> Still it would be against what we are used to have and I'm not sure
> whether
> our packagers would be happy about having kdeplasma-addons as a build dep.

David E. Narvaez