naming the next major release

[Djuro Drljaca]

Hello,

with the "chaotic" nature of (future) release cycles for individual
components the "date version number" format (for example "2013.08") is
probably a good idea :)

If I am not mistaken it was actually you (Martin G.) who initially
suggested that :)


On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Martin Graesslin <mgraesslin at kde.org>wrote:

> On Wednesday 21 August 2013 20:38:05 Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > On Monday 19 August 2013 21:56:35 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > Other proposals, ideas, tweaks to the above most welcome, but let’s
> try to
> > > come to a consensus on this matter before the end of this month.
> >
> > another idea: let's drop the version number completely and only use it
> > internally (bugtracker, libs, etc.).
> and yet another idea: code names instead of release numbers. And as we have
> such nice codenames all over our code base (hello Corona) I would suggest
> code
> names out of the field of Physics/Science e.g.
> * Plasma Higgs-Boson
>
> Cheers
> Martin
>
> P.S. and that would give us a wonderful opportunity to bike-shed about a
> name
> each other month ;-)
> _______________________________________________
> Plasma-devel mailing list
> Plasma-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20130822/629748c9/attachment.html>