Workflow Idea for 4.10
Marco Martin
notmart at gmail.com
Mon Mar 12 16:26:50 UTC 2012
On Friday 09 March 2012, Alex Fiestas wrote:
> The resulting workflow if we take into account all of that is:
>
> - Keep the 6 month release period
> - Keep the current schedule (soft freeze, hard freeze...)
> - Move to a review based workflow before hard freeze (we need gerrit).
> - Once we are on hard freeze, open merge for everyone so we can
> continue fixing things easily.
that's sounds good.
to me the ideal(tm) would be to not have much open/frozen master periods but
rather have a master that is always in a releasable state, so a bit more
destructured, but that seems even harder and this seems a good first step for
it
--
Marco Martin
More information about the Plasma-devel
mailing list