Workflow Idea for 4.10

Marco Martin notmart at gmail.com
Mon Mar 12 16:26:50 UTC 2012


On Friday 09 March 2012, Alex Fiestas wrote:
> The resulting workflow if we take into account all of that is:
> 
> - Keep the 6 month release period
> - Keep the current  schedule (soft freeze, hard freeze...)
> - Move to a review based workflow before hard freeze (we need gerrit).
> - Once we are on hard freeze, open merge for everyone so we can
> continue fixing things easily.

that's sounds good.

to me the ideal(tm) would be to not have much open/frozen master periods but 
rather have a master that is always in a releasable state, so a bit more 
destructured, but that seems even harder and this seems a good first step for 
it

-- 
Marco Martin


More information about the Plasma-devel mailing list