GSoC QMLify plasmoids proposal

[Viranch Mehta]

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Marco Martin <notmart at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Hi,
> the proposal is good, it should be a bit more elaborate tough.
> the "qmlfy" term was used just for fun, however the official proposal
> should
> have a bit more serious name, like "QML port of workspace and addons
> plasmoids"
>
> My primary target is the default plasmoids, and after that if there is
time, I'll go ahead with the addons. So I have not mentioned those in the
proposal. I hope that's fine.


> please also state that you will work together whoever will write the plasma
> qtcomponents set (hope there will be a separate gsoc for that, could end up
> be
> necessary you to work also on them...)
>
> If qtcomponents gsoc doesn't get in (and mine does), I'll not be able to
port as many plasmoids as planned. Is that considered ok?

Regards,
Viranch
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20110328/36831d19/attachment.htm