The future of virtual desktops

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Thursday, February 24, 2011, Hans Chen wrote:
> What I want to know is the following: Are there any plans or outlines
> regarding how to proceed with virtual desktop (and activities)? Are they

they are orthogonal concepts and i don't think we should at this time get too 
worked up about them. 

for those who don't use virtual desktops now -> not an issue
for those who don't use activities -> not an issue
for those who use both happily -> not an issue

people who know virtual desktops but who are learning and using activities are 
the only ones really affected, and i think it's likely to be a "growing pains" 
issue as they adjust. it may just as well work itself out naturally.

we don't know what their resulting work flows will be yet. that would be a 
matter for a field study or we can just wait and see. if/when we do know what 
the resulting work flow typically is for a virtual desktop and activities 
user, we can then take this topic up if we wish to.

but imho right now it's "not an issue" :)

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20110224/8120ca20/attachment.sig