Review Request: Add city and country resolution to GPS geolocation data using geonames.

[Beat Wolf]

> On 2009-04-14 18:59:59, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> > other than a couple of code style comments, and that i can't test it with a gps for you either :/, my only question/concern is that it's doing look ups on the internet without checking to see if we're connected. it could be in a local cache, but i'm going to guess that in a fairly typical "i'm using gps" scenario one won't have an internet connection as well. should we query solid for network status?
> > 
> > rambling off-topic here: i also wonder if we aren't going to want some "can use the internet for ..." settings somewhere for the case where we have a system with gps, cheap wifi and expensive g3 connectivity .. somethings, like looking up the place name on the internet, may not be acceptible even if there is g3 service? not a use case we actually have to deal with now, but it's something that pops into my head every once in a while .. .. like when i see a patch like this :)
> 
> Petri Damstén wrote:
>     Dataengine already checks network state but since it thinks gps does not need one it uses gps plugin. I think location -> place should be a separate plugin. It's not possible with current code though and I would like to evaluate all the other possibilities before doing rewrite (there were some wlan etc ideas as well). For 4.3 should it go like this, I'm not sure?
>     
>     For 4.4 is geoclue out of the question? It seems that we are implementing pretty much all the same things.
>
> 
> Beat Wolf wrote:
>     any progress on this patch?

can this patch be asumed dead?


- Beat


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/592/#review923
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2009-04-14 16:46:26, Andrew Coles wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/592/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2009-04-14 16:46:26)
> 
> 
> Review request for Plasma.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Yesterday, I proposed a patch for using an IP geolocation service that returns longitude and latitude, as the GPS backend would give that data but the IP one would not.  Today, it's the other way around: a patch to add place name and country information to the GPS geolocation data, as the IP geolocation gives this but GPS geolocation does not.
> 
> The only caveat is that I'm programming blind - I don't have a GPS receiver, and 'it compiles' is far from good enough.  Hence, I need a volunteer to test it - anyone?
> 
> Assuming it works, the geolocation data engine will then have reached the point where the fields returned are identical, /irregardless of whether IP or GPS data is used/.  Specifically, the user gets:
> 
> - Latitude
> - Longitude
> - Accuracy
> - Country Name
> - Country Code
> - City Name
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/kdereview/plasma/dataengines/geolocation/location_gps.h 954031 
>   /trunk/kdereview/plasma/dataengines/geolocation/location_gps.cpp 954031 
> 
> Diff: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/592/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> It compiles, and it looks alright.  How pitiful is that?  Given it's based on the IP geolocation XML code, but using a reverse geocoding rather than IP geolocation service, it should in theory work, but it really does need testing by someone with a GPS unit.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrew
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20100924/6532714d/attachment.htm