digiclock looks
Sebastian Kügler
sebas at kde.org
Fri Oct 22 22:35:16 CEST 2010
On Friday, October 22, 2010 21:57:11 todd rme wrote:
> Wow, that looks really good! A couple of things:
>
> I think the affect is a bit overdone, especially in the oxygen theme.
> You don't want it to jump out too much, but you also don't want it to
> take too much effort for someone to pick it out from the background,
> either. I personally have trouble picking out the new clock in oxygen
> without some focus, while in all other pictures (new and old) it jumps
> out at me so I can read it at a glance.
>
> Can you post some screenshots of how it looks when it isn't in a panel?
I'll do that after some more tweaking, others have come up with nice ideas as
well, I think we're on to something.
> Are you sure embossed is the right effect? I personally think a
> sunken look would be better, especially with the panel looking like it
> is convex. If it isn't too much trouble, screenshots of both for
> comparison might be good.
It's very subtle, and it's not quite clear wether it's emboss or shadow, at
least without blurring the backdrop.
> Is there any way to make it so themes can specify whether it embossed,
> sunken, or flush? Some themes, like ASCII or ghost, would probably
> look better without the effect.
Hm, yes probably.
> Maybe they can specify the colors for
> emboss/sinking as well. You might even be able to make it
> configurable on a per-widget basis, but I am not sure you want another
> config option.
I'm pretty sure actually: no way. :-) (Meaning, it has to be good enough for
all themes, which is hopefully achievable.)
Anyway, I'll play some more with it, suggestions are of course still welcome.
(And I hope they don't exceed my graphics coding skills.)
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
More information about the Plasma-devel
mailing list