activitymanager api

[Ivan Čukić]

> neh, it'd be awkward api. activityClosedOrCancelled()? yuck.

Ok

> no, it's quite literally impossible. ksmserver won't do it.
> unless you want to implement a queue for activities to sit in and wait for
> ksmserver to handle them... but that'd be overcomplicating things imho.

It is needed for the progress indication - to forward from IRC

[22:21] <ivan_cukic> well, while ksmserver stops one activity, user clicks
'stop' on the another one. In order to show the progress animation it needs
also to be in the transitional state. It doesn't matter that ksmserver processes
them one by one

Cheerio

-- 
While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words
Dying to believe in what you heard
I was staring straight into the shining sun