4.5 - Activities

Chani chanika at gmail.com
Wed Mar 10 05:12:08 CET 2010


On March 9, 2010 19:50:52 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On March 9, 2010, Chani wrote:
> > well yeah, but then when the screen is disconnected you can't get at the
> > containment(s) that were on it until you reconnect a screen.
> > or do you think that's just not important?
> 
> i can imagine use cases where it's important, but it's something we can
> address later easily enough.
> 
> or maybe we could get it nearly "for free" when we get around to stashing
> containments that are associated with a screen that doesn't currently
> exist; we could show these other containments as part of the activity that
> can be switched between, perhaps via a popup or other "slide out" in the
> activity switcher.
> 
> but yes, there is a lot of groundwork that needs to be done first before we
> get to this chasm-in-need-of-a-bridge and i don't see anything that would
> create a blocker to building that bridge when we need to.

ok :)

it was mostly the fact that the api has the assumption that there is One And 
Only One "current" activity; wanted to be sure that wouldn't cause us 
headaches someday.

-- 
This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3.
www.chani3.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20100309/7acb1257/attachment.sig 


More information about the Plasma-devel mailing list