PlasmaKPart moved to kdereview

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Friday, August 13, 2010, Richard Moore wrote:
> Note that the dpointer issues matter since people will have to link
> directly to the class to make use of the methods that are not standard
> kpart ones so binary compatibility would be needed. An alternative
> would be to use a KParts extension for these methods as khtml does,
> but it's not the case here.

there should be no public API offered by this kpart. so far we've been able
to design things in a way that makes this possible without introducing
 strange hacks to the users of the kpart.

there are some aspects of usage of the kpart that do need work; e.g. the
 createConfigurationInterface method needs to be rethought. 

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F
 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20100813/a791549a/attachment.sig