Subject: Re: [GSoC] Proposal: Authentication for scripted plasmoid downloaded from the web

[Chani]

On April 5, 2010 15:33:00 Diego Casella ([Po]lentino) wrote:
> Hi all,
> after reading some comments on my proposal, I've performed a couple of
> changes on the implementation details and the timeline, so it should fit
> better the GSoC schedule now :)
> To be more precise, I've also included improving PlasMate in order to show
> a widget to easily create and manage the private and public keys, along
> with the possibility to export the public keys.
> The Publish widget will be improved as well, showing a "Sign" checkbox that
> will allow the developer to choose which key, from the ones previously
> created, will be used to sign the plasmoid before the install/upload
> process.

having plasmoid signing in plasmate is a good idea :)
"create and manage keys", though? that sounds like kgpg's job.
I would imagine that plasmate would have something like kmail, where you can 
choose which key to use for signing, from your existing keys...

although, you might want to add something that makes it easy for people not so 
familiar with gpg to get set up. so, hmm.

-- 
This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3.
www.chani3.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20100405/f4c6f83d/attachment.sig