kubuntu kdebase patches to plasma

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On November 13, 2009, Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
> This isn't a new discussion wrt Kubuntu and we've more than "suddenly
> noticed". This is the third? time we've submitted the patch with our
> arguments for changes. One, it is part of our process since we don't
> want to deviate from upstream as much as possible, and Two, we really
> do think this patch is an improvement. We are free to defend it and
> you are free to ignore it as usual.

as a suggestion: resubmitting the same patches with the same rational after 
it's already been discussed and rejected is probably not overly useful. in 
fact, it's frustrating.

sending new patches upstream is useful.
sending old patches with new approaches in the code or new information can be.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20091113/37115b2c/attachment.sig