thinking ahead to 4.5: features or polish?

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On November 4, 2009, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> So, This should be done, but it shouldn't be like "No features, stop".
> We should just put more emphasis on polish, but still let features to
> come in.

i can have a great emphasis on polish.
maybe a few of the others here can too.

but is that enough?

given that i'm spending more and more and more of a release cycle fixing bugs 
in other people's code and finishing features other people start, i'm not sure 
it would be.

by saying "we're only interested in polishing for this release" we are, quite 
precisely, emphasizing polish.

we will have many future releases for new features that push beyond what we 
offer now.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20091104/a63a628e/attachment.sig