Jolie and Plasma.... and Akonadi?

[Fabrizio Montesi]

My main problem for UPnP support is time, but as I've said I'd be willing to
mentor the JOLIE side of that. =)
Perhaps once we get this library and some end-user benefits (like
Plasma::Service integration and a plasmoid that makes use of it), we will
gain enough interest and get someone to cooperate with us.. or I'll find a
thesist willing to do this. ;)

2009/1/28 Kevin Ottens <ervin at kde.org>

> On Wednesday 28 January 2009 09:33:25 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 January 2009, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > > I somehow assumed this library would end up as some private classes in
> > > libplasma but perhaps it makes sense to even go for pure Qt API and for
> > > kdesupport to give it the chance for wider adoption? (actually that'd
> > > make
> >
> > i think it makes sense if plasma isn't going to be the sole point of
> > contact for Jolie. i figured it'd take a bit longer for that to happen,
> but
> > i should learn to stop underestimating the kde community's amazing pace
> of
> > movement ;)
>
> OK, I'll make it a goal for Tokamak II then. Now that I think of it, if I
> ever
> manage to push Fabrizio to have UPnP support in Jolie I might even use that
> in
> Solid at some point. I think I'd prefer having one solution for all our
> service needs, than talking to Jolie in some cases or some other daemon in
> some others.
>
> Regards.
> --
> Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
> "Ni le maître sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans maître,
> Ne font reculer l'ignorance."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plasma-devel mailing list
> Plasma-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20090128/fcea26cd/attachment.htm