Jolie and Plasma.... and Akonadi?

[Kevin Ottens]

On Wednesday 28 January 2009 09:33:25 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 January 2009, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > I somehow assumed this library would end up as some private classes in
> > libplasma but perhaps it makes sense to even go for pure Qt API and for
> > kdesupport to give it the chance for wider adoption? (actually that'd
> > make
>
> i think it makes sense if plasma isn't going to be the sole point of
> contact for Jolie. i figured it'd take a bit longer for that to happen, but
> i should learn to stop underestimating the kde community's amazing pace of
> movement ;)

OK, I'll make it a goal for Tokamak II then. Now that I think of it, if I ever 
manage to push Fabrizio to have UPnP support in Jolie I might even use that in 
Solid at some point. I think I'd prefer having one solution for all our 
service needs, than talking to Jolie in some cases or some other daemon in 
some others.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
"Ni le maître sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans maître,
Ne font reculer l'ignorance."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20090128/5d58b0d3/attachment.sig