4.2 feature targets

Guillaume Pothier gpothier at gmail.com
Mon Oct 20 22:58:51 CEST 2008


2008/10/20 Aaron J. Seigo <aseigo at kde.org>:
>
> still, this should probably be gotten from plasma as we can do a much better
> job than the current WM can i think. in fact, we could change it to returning
> a region or set of rects that are out of bounds, allowing us to avoid the
> "panel is at the top, but doesn't cover the right corner and yet the toolbox
> is still too low"

Yes that sounds nice.

>> * popupPosition in plasma.cpp: Needs the actual screen position
>>
>> * PopupAppletPrivate::updateDialogPosition. Needs the actual screen
>> position.
>
> i'm not sure if these two can be addressed in the same manner, as i just
> haven't looked into it ... but .. maybe?

I guess that as long as we can do something as:
Plasma::Corona::self()->numViewports() and
Plasma::Corona::self()->viewportGeometry(id),
we're done (we need that singleton as popupPosition can't have a ref
to the corona, at least at first sight).

g

>
> --
> Aaron J. Seigo
> humru othro a kohnu se
> GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
>
> KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plasma-devel mailing list
> Plasma-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
>
>


More information about the Plasma-devel mailing list