Extender api review, round 2
Alex Merry
huntedhacker at tiscali.co.uk
Thu Jul 31 02:02:54 CEST 2008
On Thursday 31 July 2008 00:28:06 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> * Extender now has no explicit ownership
It's the ownership thing that puzzled me in the first place. But I can live
with the API as it stands. It just doesn't necessarily feel completely
natural to me.
> > I'm afraid I'm coming at this without a clear idea of the concepts around
> > extenders, except that they allow users to pull parts of applets away
> > from the main widget.
>
> the point is to allow aditional, usually either transient or more detailed,
> items to be shown as an extension to an applet. those items are detachable
> and mixable.
>
> examples might be notifications in a notifier or calendar information in a
> clock.
Yes, that's as far as my knowledge of extenders went before I jumped into this
thread. It's the details, such as how the lifetime of extensions is related
to the lifetime of the applet, that I wasn't clear about.
Alex
--
KDE: http://www.kde.org
Ubuntu/Kubuntu: http://www.ubuntu.org http://www.kubuntu.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20080731/9dd1bccf/attachment.pgp
More information about the Plasma-devel
mailing list