Wallpaper class; API review requested

[Kevin Ottens]

Le Wednesday 13 August 2008, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
> On Wednesday 13 August 2008, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Le Tuesday 12 August 2008, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
> > > ownership of the Wallpaper* would then be taken by the Containment in
> > > this case;
> >
> > Is that required?
>
> no; but then it's another connect-to-destroyed(QObject*) bit of code.

I think this solution would still have my preference over the current one.

> > > which 3 properties?
> >
> > /me looks at his hand again.
> > OK, I can't count it seems, the 2 properties so that obviously less of a
> > problem *for now*. Could that grow? I've a hard time figuring out if it's
> > likely or not... But somehow I clearly imagine that modes could have more
> > information attached to them, for instance "is it animated?", for
> > decision
>
> i think that would be internal to the wallpaper and not exposed.

OK, makes sense.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
"Ni le maître sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans maître,
Ne font reculer l'ignorance."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20080813/7d0c0e99/attachment.pgp