Phonon design in general

[Matthias Kretz]

On Wednesday 04 July 2007, Håvard Wall wrote:
> From my point of view 50K is well worth some efforts. Your size
> measurements for QtCore and QtGui looks about right to me, they're big, and
> that's why we need the qfeature system to let the customer reduce the
> library size. I don't think it's fair to compare the size of phonon to the
> size of Qt. If you compare individual features within Qt you'll find that
> even the largest feature (graphics-view) is less than 300K.
>
> I believe the idea of moving "utility" classes into a separate library
> might be a good idea, but we should probably create some use-cases for how
> a programmer will be using phonon to see what classes might be disposable
> in most cases.

How about a feature system for phonon? That would let us keep phonon as one 
lib on all platforms and on embedded you could disable some stuff if you need 
the size...

-- 
________________________________________________________
Matthias Kretz (Germany)                            <><
http://Vir.homelinux.org/
MatthiasKretz at gmx.net, kretz at kde.org,
Matthias.Kretz at urz.uni-heidelberg.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/phonon-backends/attachments/20070704/0a913a7e/attachment.pgp