Emailing: objectdescriptionmodel.patch

[Matthias Kretz]

On Monday 02 July 2007, Thierry Bastian wrote:
> Anyway, this still boils down to the question: do we do a
> libphononutilities? If yes then ObjectDescriptionModel clearly has its
> place there.
> And then exporting the factory::icon function even if it's a private header
> is not a problem.

Yes.

> If Håvard finds a huge difference in size then we may simply have to split.
> Let's wait and see.

So I'll wait with all further lib-size testing until Håvard gives us some hard 
numbers. (Especially I'd like to know the size of some other libs to have a 
reference and motivation what to aim for.)

> During the meeting last week a small suggestion: why not call VideoPlayer
> SimpleVideoPlayer (same thing for audio). The thing is that people might
> expect a lot from those widgets and I don't think we want people to file
> thousands of requests for it to have the same feature-set as a complete
> media player.

Actually AudioPlayer was called SimplePlayer until 2006-07-06. I renamed it to 
AudioPlayer after a mini-review done by Lars at the Trysil meeting. But I 
agree that prepending simple should help a bit against feature requests. What 
impact will the name change have on code readability and discoverability of 
the class?

-- 
________________________________________________________
Matthias Kretz (Germany)                            <><
http://Vir.homelinux.org/
MatthiasKretz at gmx.net, kretz at kde.org,
Matthias.Kretz at urz.uni-heidelberg.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/phonon-backends/attachments/20070702/e02f33b6/attachment.pgp