Plasmagik GSoC Proposal

[Joe Burns]

Thanks for the feedback. I talked a bit to ruphy last night and it looks
like there are some details that still need to be worked out. After talking
with him some more I'll submit a revised proposal with your feedback and new
details in mind.

Thanks,
Joe Burns

2008/3/23 Aaron J. Seigo <aseigo at kde.org>:

> On Saturday 22 March 2008, Joe Burns wrote:
> > Here is a draft of my SoC proposal for Plasmagik, the packager
> application.
> > Any feedback or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > http://www.siue.edu/~josebur/SoCProposal1.pdf<http://www.siue.edu/%7Ejosebur/SoCProposal1.pdf>
>
> thoughts/feedback:
>
> * a bit more description of what "All this information will need to be
> displayed in a user-friendly way by the GUI class" means would likely
> improve
> your odds of being approved.
>
> * maybe say something about the creation of the metadata files?
>
> * perhaps add writing some more test cases in there?
>
> * testing and integration with Plasma::Theme, Plasma::Applet (for
> plasmoids),
> etc..?
>
> as it stands, the proposal, which useful to Plasma, feels a bit short on
> details and probably doesn't sound like something that would fill up an
> entire SoC project time?
>
> --
> Aaron J. Seigo
> humru othro a kohnu se
> GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
>
> KDE core developer sponsored by Trolltech
>
> _______________________________________________
> Panel-devel mailing list
> Panel-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/panel-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/panel-devel/attachments/20080324/e33d4759/attachment.html