[PATCH] secure config action for my soc project

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Friday 18 July 2008, Chani wrote:
> funny, I was thinking about that as I went to sleep... problem is, that
> method's virtual now, so I still can't be 100% certain it'll get stopped. I
> guess it'll have to do, though.

a really evil possibility might be to have a forwarding action .. so everyone 
that's connected to "configure" would keep on as they are, but have another 
action called sth like "configure_forwarder" or whatever that is actually used 
in the UI (and kept otherwise hidden from the outside world) and then plasma 
could control the connection between those two actions.

not exctly simple, but a possibility for future improvements to action 
management?

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Trolltech

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/panel-devel/attachments/20080718/d4fc81b4/attachment.pgp