[REVIEW] removing (probably) unnecessary condition in dataUpdated(...)

[Chani]

On April 15, 2008 10:26:04 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Chani wrote:
> > hmmm. it would be nice to enforce that. but are there any cases where <1s
> > updates are desired?
>
> yes, but we'll align to the second anyways (or as best we can). so a 300ms
> timer should fire at 300, 600, 1000, 300, 600, 900 .. a 500ms timer should
> always fire at 500 and 1000 .. i don't think engines need exact sub-second
> timer resolution (mostly because they don't get it anyways ;) so this
> should be ok.

in that case we're going to have to remember to fix the alignment behaviour. 
iirc, if you set AlignToMinute with, say, a 15s update, you're going to get 
updates at 1:00, 1:15, 2:00, 2:15...

-- 
This message brought to you by evyl bananas, and the number 3.
www.chani3.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/panel-devel/attachments/20080415/a35d3b12/attachment-0001.pgp