[Nepomuk] Suggestion about version string used in various nepomuk* binaries

[Vishesh Handa]

Hey Jekyll

On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Jekyll Wu <adaptee at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Various nepomuk* binaries(nepomukstorage, nepomukindexer, etc)
> effectively use the "0.1.0" version string, and that version has
> stayed there for a very long time. That puts nepomuk in a similar
> position in bugs.kde.org as where plasma was a few months ago[1] .
>
> I know nepomuk is becoming more and more stable in recent releases,
> but it still receives quite a lot of crash reports, many of which are
> from old versions and have already been fixed. Please choose a better
> version scheme(at lease it should change between major releases) , and
> make better use of bugzilla's feature of rejecting reports from
> disabled versions to make your lives better.

You're absolutely right. We should use a better scheme.

>
> Using KDE_VERSION_STRING would be the laziest solution, or make
> NEPOMUK_VERSION_STRING independent upon CMAKE_NEPOMUK_CORE_VERSION_*
> and update it more frequently.

I'd prefer using KDE_VERSION_STRING since we are part of KDE SC for now.

>
> Also see my similar requests against dolphin[2] and systemsettings[3].
>
> [1] https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109906/
> [2] http://lists.kde.org/?l=kfm-devel&m=137120231924936&w=2
> [3] https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111402/
>
>
> Regards
> Jekyll
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk



--
Vishesh Handa