[Nepomuk] Nepomuk2 Migration Questions

[Vishesh Handa]

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:25 PM, David Narvaez <david.narvaez at computer.org>wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Vishesh Handa <me at vhanda.in> wrote:
> >> 3. What replacements are there for the old Utils namespace? For
> >> instance, Nepomuk Shell uses SimpleResourceModel, is there any
> >> replacement for that?
> >
> >
> > Right now, I think it would be better if you just copied the models you
> > need and move them to the Nepomuk2 namespace as well.
>
> Did that, and after a couple of changes I manged to compile and run
> Nepomuk Shell, the patch is in the ReviewBoard. Now I have another set
> of questions - more like confirmations, since it already runs etc.
>
> 1. (An easy one) Methods like resourceType() and resourceUri()  are
> now type() and uri() right?
>
Yup


> 2. In CMake, it looks like in the old Nepomuk you could
> find_package(Nepomuk REQUIRED) and then include(SopranoAddOntology)
> but in Nepomuk2 I had to find_package(NepomukCore REQUIRED) and also
> find_package(Soprano REQUIRED) to include(SopranoAddOntology), am I
> correct?
>

Yup

>
> I think I had one more question but I can't remember... Anyhow, thanks
> for your answers, and we can follow up with the patch itself in the
> ReviewBoard.
>
> David E. Narváez
>



-- 
Vishesh Handa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20130103/c6f20b11/attachment-0001.html>