[Nepomuk] Review Request 108982: Reduce number of virtuoso server threads

Simeon Bird bladud at gmail.com
Sat Feb 16 20:33:01 UTC 2013



> On Feb. 16, 2013, 7:32 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > I'm not too sure if 10 threads is enough. We have currently 3 ways of accessing the storage service, each of which spawns a new thread -
> > * QueryService
> > * Data Management functions
> > * Soprano stuff
> > 
> > The QueryService and DataMangagementFunctions are each allocated from a different thread pool of 10 threads. The DataManagement thread pool is never cleaned up (look at datamanagementadpator.cpp). Just these two bring us up to a total of 20 threads. Now there is the fact that each application connects to Nepomuk via the local socket which will also spawn a new thread.
> > 
> > Maybe 30 is a decent number?
> > 
> > For 4.11, we need to combine all these 3 different ways of connecting into 1. I think it would be best if we rolled our own Server/Client code instead of relying on Soprano's which is a little hard to configure according to our needs.

Aha, I didn't realise the QueryService and DataManagement functions were both separate threads. 
If you're going to re-work the storage service connections anyway, this is probably not worth the risk, so I'll drop it. 
Thanks


- Simeon


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108982/#review27554
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 16, 2013, 3:43 p.m., Simeon Bird wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108982/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 16, 2013, 3:43 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk and Vishesh Handa.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Since soprano no longer creates a separate connection to the database for every thread, we can safely use fewer ServerThreads in virtuoso, saving memory.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   services/storage/repository.cpp 6a1d004446021b005d8e1d0ab3e70f2cf16de956 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108982/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Re-indexed some files, less memory is used, nothing seems to break.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Simeon Bird
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20130216/06ee69c4/attachment.html>


More information about the Nepomuk mailing list