[Nepomuk] Review Request 109856: FIX: exiv2extractor did not import exif datetime.

[Commit Hook]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109856/#review30444
-----------------------------------------------------------


This review has been submitted with commit 5e0ee421bf16f772080fab1a87b7dbcd2c5a6f5d by Ignacio Serantes to branch master.

- Commit Hook


On April 5, 2013, 10:35 a.m., Ignacio Serantes wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109856/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 5, 2013, 10:35 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk and Vishesh Handa.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There was a FIXME in exiv2extractor.cpp about datetime exif tag and I wrote the code required to convert information to exif format to xsd:datetime.
> 
> I'm using val.setUtcOffset(0) to convert datetime generated by QDateTime::fromString() because datetime information stored in exif is in local time. If there is a better method to do this please inform me.
> 
> This fix don't fix exactly the bug https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317501 because the bug is related to datetimes collected with strigi, but will permit to reindex images and solve the issue. In brief I'm not sure if I must assign this review to the bug or not.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 317501.
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317501
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   services/fileindexer/indexer/exiv2extractor.cpp 7c7fe21 
>   services/fileindexer/indexer/extractorplugin.cpp 5d834c9 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109856/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> With several photos in JPEG and NEF format comparing values obtained by extractor with values obtained by Digikam and exiv2 console program.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ignacio Serantes
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20130405/c868d840/attachment-0001.html>