[Nepomuk] Nepomuk Tags kioslave - Please Review

Vishesh Handa me at vhanda.in
Thu Nov 29 11:47:02 UTC 2012


On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org> wrote:

> El Dijous, 22 de novembre de 2012, a les 10:27:41, David Faure va escriure:
> > On Thursday 22 November 2012 00:24:12 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > El Dimecres, 21 de novembre de 2012, a les 16:15:01, David Faure va
> >
> > escriure:
> > > > On Wednesday 07 November 2012 02:27:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > > > Ahh, you mean copying from file: to tags:
> > > > Moving from file: to tags:, rather.
> > >
> > > Right
> > >
> > > > > I see... I'd like to hear David's opinion on how that is going to
> be
> > > > > fixed
> > > > > at  the kio/kioslave level.
> > > >
> > > > Not at that level. Apps should be able to call move and end up with a
> > > > move.
> > >
> > > Even if that means destroying the file into hyperspace?
> >
> > Well, kioslaves were meant to be V*FS*. A file system doesn't lose files
> > into hyperspace :)
>
> Sure, but it's still Virtual ;-)
>
> > However we already have a number of settings for "this or that
> functionality
> > isn't supported by this kioslave". Hmm, I wonder, what does tags:/ do in
> > put()? Where does it "write the file", if it's only a virtual collection
> of
> > stuff?
>
> Not sure, but i understand it adds the tag of the url you are in to the
> file
> you are dropping.
>
>
> >
> > If put() isn't supported, then moving (by get+put) won't be supported.
> > Only copyFromFile would be possible, which is exactly what you need,
> isn't
> > it?
>
> Ah, interesting, maybe copyFromFile is what Vishesh needs? Vishesh does it
> make sense dropping urls to tags:/ from something different than file:/ ?
>

No. It doesn't.

Theoretically one can tag anything but for now I only want to support files.


> Cheers,
>   Albert
>
> >
> > In other words, try not implementing put, if that makes sense, and let me
> > know what doesn't work.
> >
> > > > But the fix is to let drag-n-drop trigger a copy rather than allowing
> > > > the
> > > > user to select "move". The quick fix for that is
> > > > http://www.davidfaure.fr/2012/konq_operations.cpp.diff
> > > > Which hardcodes the protocol name, but at least it gets the job done.
> > > >
> > > > If we agree about this on principle, then the next step to make it
> > > > generic
> > > > could be to add another field in .protocol files, say
> > > > forceDropAction=(copy|move)
> > > > The fact that kio_trash needs forceDropAction=move shows that this
> might
> > > > make sense, we already have two users for this setting.
> > >
> > > I guess that works for me, since apps won't probably ever call "move"
> into
> > > a tags: url
> >
> > OK. But let's keep this solution under the arm for now, until we find out
> > about put() above.
> >
> > >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to
> unsubscribe
> > >> <<
>
> >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to
> unsubscribe <<
>



-- 
Vishesh Handa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20121129/c9e3b4a7/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Nepomuk mailing list