[Nepomuk] Questions about Nepomuk Core

[Vishesh Handa]

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:53 AM, David Narvaez
<david.narvaez at computer.org>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have tried to follow the thread about the Nepomuk situation but
> can't figure out answers to these questions now that I'm working on
> Activities and Nepomuk to fix the Icons/Ontologies tragedy:
>
> 1) When will Nepomuk Core replace kde-runtime's Nepomuk services and
> stuff? KDE 4.9?
>

Yup. That's the plan.


> 2) Nepomuk Core seems to depend on Soprano's latest Git version which
> includes the commit 3206bae6 that adds DefiningProperty, and this
> doesn't seem to be lined up to Soprano 2.7, judging by the 2.7 branch.
> Will Nepomuk Core depend on next Soprano release?
>

Yes. Sebastian should release the next version of Soprano. It contains a
lot of important fixes.


> 3) It looks like Nepomuk Core is not API compatible with kde-runtime's
> Nepomuk, e.g. it is missing setSymbols and maybe other methods. This
> affects Activities Library, so my question is if Activities Library's
> master should be patched to work with Nepomuk Core for KDE 4.9 or the
> other way around.
>

I think setSymbols should be added to nepomuk-core. A lot of people use it,
and there is no replacement. I cannot remember the exact reason we'd
removed setSymbols. I do however remember having to patch it up for KDE 4.8.

To answer your question - both.


> Thanks.
>
> David E. Narváez
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>



-- 
Vishesh Handa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20120517/0965a275/attachment.html>