[Nepomuk] Re: Some (a lot of) ideas for/issues with the Nepomuk ontologies
Sebastian Trüg
trueg at kde.org
Tue Jun 14 11:38:20 CEST 2011
Hi George,
any chance you could move that branch to sourceforge?
Cheers,
Sebastian
On 06/09/2011 11:12 AM, George Goldberg wrote:
> On 4 May 2011 11:07, Sebastian Trüg <trueg at kde.org> wrote:
>> Hi George,
>>
>> sorry for the late reply. I took an extended parental leave in the wake
>> of the birth of my second daughter. :)
>
> Even later, I've updated the branch to take into account your comments.
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~gberg/ontologies/commit/?h=presence-clarification&id=8c4aec68b31167ce5c65a37127eb45d53d1a57b5
>
>> As for your patch. Very nice, I only have two comments:
>> 1. IMHO the new type should simply be called nco:IMStatusType, the
>> "identifier" suffix seems random to me. Also we already use distinction
>> by case in some cases.
>> 2. I would add labels to the predefined types so that simple apps do not
>> need to bring their own.
>
> --
> George
>
More information about the Nepomuk
mailing list