[Nepomuk] Re: Some (a lot of) ideas for/issues with the Nepomuk ontologies
George Goldberg
grundleborg at googlemail.com
Thu Jun 9 11:12:51 CEST 2011
On 4 May 2011 11:07, Sebastian Trüg <trueg at kde.org> wrote:
> Hi George,
>
> sorry for the late reply. I took an extended parental leave in the wake
> of the birth of my second daughter. :)
Even later, I've updated the branch to take into account your comments.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~gberg/ontologies/commit/?h=presence-clarification&id=8c4aec68b31167ce5c65a37127eb45d53d1a57b5
> As for your patch. Very nice, I only have two comments:
> 1. IMHO the new type should simply be called nco:IMStatusType, the
> "identifier" suffix seems random to me. Also we already use distinction
> by case in some cases.
> 2. I would add labels to the predefined types so that simple apps do not
> need to bring their own.
--
George
More information about the Nepomuk
mailing list