[Nepomuk] Re: Development status tracking
Sebastian Trüg
trueg at kde.org
Mon Jul 4 13:51:47 CEST 2011
well, I did not really know the difference between the two. I always
assumed that techbase was for technical things while community was for
end user stuff. If it is the other way around IMHO the site names are
badly chosen. :P
It community is the right choice - fine, let's go there. I do not care
at all.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On 07/04/2011 11:23 AM, Artem Serebriyskiy wrote:
> And, by the way, why techbase.kde.org <http://techbase.kde.org> ? Why
> not community.kde.org <http://community.kde.org> ?
> http://techbase.kde.org/Projects states that info for external users
> should go to techbase, for internal - to community.kde.org
> <http://community.kde.org>.
> Not that I am against techbase - I just want raise and solve this
> question before I start filling my pages. Not a big fan of moving pages
> from one wiki to another :)
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Artem Serebriyskiy
> <v.for.vandal at gmail.com <mailto:v.for.vandal at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Vishesh Handa <handa.vish at gmail.com
> <mailto:handa.vish at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hey Everyone
>
> I think tracking development is a great idea, and using a wiki
> is a lot better than bugzilla. But, still, a wiki? Editing a
> wiki is a somewhat laborious task. Plus, it doesn't even look
> that good. Then again, that will hopefully be improved. Does
> anyone know of any better tools to track development? I'm hoping
> for something that is a bit more machine readable.
>
> I don't [know], but may be there is a way to add such a page to
> projects.kde.org <http://projects.kde.org> instead of wiki? It
> already tracks commits, project descriptions and so on. May be it
> can provide us with some 'metaproject' page for Nepomuk where we can
> propogate statuses from usual nepomuk projects pages?
>
> But, again, I have no idea what can Redmine do and what can't. So
> this weak idea needs more exploration.
>
>
> Anyway, lets go on with the wiki page for now. It's better than
> nothing.
>
> I'll add what all I'm working on over there.
> Maybe even clean up the pages.
>
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Sebastian Trüg <trueg at kde.org
> <mailto:trueg at kde.org>> wrote:
>
> maybe splitting into core and apps would be nice, too?
> "Core" being the
> backend stuff like storage/DMS, file indexer, query service
> and the
> libraries, "apps" the rest
>
>
> Yes. That's a great idea.
>
>
>
> On 07/03/2011 11:51 AM, Paweł Paprota wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > On 07/03/2011 11:41 AM, Artem Serebriyskiy wrote:
> >> And what are the policies/guidlines of adding a project
> to this page ?
> >>
> >
> > Good question - this should be stated on the page. IMHO every
> > development activity (at the high level) should be
> reflected in the status.
> >
> > If there will be too many entries, it can be split into
> categories
> > (GSOC, refactoring, bugfixing etc.) but I think the more
> information the
> > better.
> >
> >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Paweł
> Paprota<ppawel at fastmail.fm <mailto:ppawel at fastmail.fm>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey,
> >>>
> >>> On 07/03/2011 10:58 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> >>>> Just a quick "yes, please" from me. I think this is a
> very good idea and
> >>>> I would gladly track my tasks on such a page, link
> other information to
> >>>> it and blog about it.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Good to hear!
> >>>
> >>>> Would you take the task of finishing this page? Maybe
> add a big fat
> >>>> Nepomuk logo on top? ;)
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Sure. The problem is that I don't actually know what
> tasks are being
> >>> worked on currently! This was in fact the main reason
> for starting the
> >>> tracking page.
> >>>
> >>> Moreover, the core of this idea is that the tracking
> will be done
> >>> collectively so nothing's stopping anyone from updating
> the status.
> >>>
> >>> I still have a few ideas on how to improve the shape and
> form of the
> >>> page itself but obviously further suggestions are welcome.
> >>>
> >>> So basically to answer your question once again - yes
> and what else
> >>> would you like to see there?
> >>>
> >>> Paweł
> >>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>> Sebastian
> >>>>
> >>>> On 07/03/2011 09:34 AM, Paweł Paprota wrote:
> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> as I'm about to start another development task in the
> Nepomuk project,
> >>>>> an idea came to my mind. I already said random things
> on IRC about using
> >>>>> Bugzilla for tracking development but I've decided to
> give this idea a
> >>>>> proper shape.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So here is the first iteration:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/DevelopmentStatus
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There is enough introductory information on the page
> that I think
> >>>>> there's no need to duplicate the explanation of the
> idea in this e-mail.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Let me know what you think and if it would be feasible
> to try to
> >>>>> maintain this page and see how it works (or doesn't work).
> >>>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Nepomuk mailing list
> >>>> Nepomuk at kde.org <mailto:Nepomuk at kde.org>
> >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Nepomuk mailing list
> >>> Nepomuk at kde.org <mailto:Nepomuk at kde.org>
> >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Nepomuk mailing list
> >> Nepomuk at kde.org <mailto:Nepomuk at kde.org>
> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nepomuk mailing list
> > Nepomuk at kde.org <mailto:Nepomuk at kde.org>
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org <mailto:Nepomuk at kde.org>
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>
>
>
>
> --
> Vishesh Handa
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org <mailto:Nepomuk at kde.org>
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Artem Serebriyskiy
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Artem Serebriyskiy
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
More information about the Nepomuk
mailing list