[Nepomuk] Re: Development status tracking

[Artem Serebriyskiy]

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Vishesh Handa <handa.vish at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Everyone
>
> I think tracking development is a great idea, and using a wiki is a lot
> better than bugzilla. But, still, a wiki? Editing a wiki is a somewhat
> laborious task. Plus, it doesn't even look that good. Then again, that will
> hopefully be improved. Does anyone know of any better tools to track
> development? I'm hoping for something that is a bit more machine readable.
>
I don't [know], but may be there is a way to add such a page to
projects.kde.org instead of wiki? It already tracks commits, project
descriptions and so on. May be it can provide us with some 'metaproject'
page for Nepomuk where we can propogate statuses from usual nepomuk projects
pages?

But, again, I have no idea what can Redmine do and what can't. So this weak
idea needs more exploration.

>
> Anyway, lets go on with the wiki page for now. It's better than nothing.
>
> I'll add what all I'm working on over there.
> Maybe even clean up the pages.
>
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Sebastian Trüg <trueg at kde.org> wrote:
>
>> maybe splitting into core and apps would be nice, too? "Core" being the
>> backend stuff like storage/DMS, file indexer, query service and the
>> libraries, "apps" the rest
>>
>
> Yes. That's a great idea.
>
>
>>
>> On 07/03/2011 11:51 AM, Paweł Paprota wrote:
>> > Hey,
>> >
>> > On 07/03/2011 11:41 AM, Artem Serebriyskiy wrote:
>> >> And what are the policies/guidlines of adding a project to this page ?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Good question - this should be stated on the page. IMHO every
>> > development activity (at the high level) should be reflected in the
>> status.
>> >
>> > If there will be too many entries, it can be split into categories
>> > (GSOC, refactoring, bugfixing etc.) but I think the more information the
>> > better.
>> >
>> >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Paweł Paprota<ppawel at fastmail.fm>
>>  wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hey,
>> >>>
>> >>> On 07/03/2011 10:58 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
>> >>>> Just a quick "yes, please" from me. I think this is a very good idea
>> and
>> >>>> I would gladly track my tasks on such a page, link other information
>> to
>> >>>> it and blog about it.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Good to hear!
>> >>>
>> >>>> Would you take the task of finishing this page? Maybe add a big fat
>> >>>> Nepomuk logo on top? ;)
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Sure. The problem is that I don't actually know what tasks are being
>> >>> worked on currently! This was in fact the main reason for starting the
>> >>> tracking page.
>> >>>
>> >>> Moreover, the core of this idea is that the tracking will be done
>> >>> collectively so nothing's stopping anyone from updating the status.
>> >>>
>> >>> I still have a few ideas on how to improve the shape and form of the
>> >>> page itself but obviously further suggestions are welcome.
>> >>>
>> >>> So basically to answer your question once again - yes and what else
>> >>> would you like to see there?
>> >>>
>> >>> Paweł
>> >>>
>> >>>> Cheers
>> >>>> Sebastian
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 07/03/2011 09:34 AM, Paweł Paprota wrote:
>> >>>>> Hello,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> as I'm about to start another development task in the Nepomuk
>> project,
>> >>>>> an idea came to my mind. I already said random things on IRC about
>> using
>> >>>>> Bugzilla for tracking development but I've decided to give this idea
>> a
>> >>>>> proper shape.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> So here is the first iteration:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/DevelopmentStatus
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> There is enough introductory information on the page that I think
>> >>>>> there's no need to duplicate the explanation of the idea in this
>> e-mail.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Let me know what you think and if it would be feasible to try to
>> >>>>> maintain this page and see how it works (or doesn't work).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> Nepomuk mailing list
>> >>>> Nepomuk at kde.org
>> >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Nepomuk mailing list
>> >>> Nepomuk at kde.org
>> >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Nepomuk mailing list
>> >> Nepomuk at kde.org
>> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Nepomuk mailing list
>> > Nepomuk at kde.org
>> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nepomuk mailing list
>> Nepomuk at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Vishesh Handa
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>
>


-- 
Sincerely yours,
Artem Serebriyskiy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20110704/aef97055/attachment.htm