[Nepomuk] Re: Development status tracking

[Sebastian Trüg]

maybe splitting into core and apps would be nice, too? "Core" being the
backend stuff like storage/DMS, file indexer, query service and the
libraries, "apps" the rest

On 07/03/2011 11:51 AM, Paweł Paprota wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> On 07/03/2011 11:41 AM, Artem Serebriyskiy wrote:
>> And what are the policies/guidlines of adding a project to this page ?
>>
> 
> Good question - this should be stated on the page. IMHO every 
> development activity (at the high level) should be reflected in the status.
> 
> If there will be too many entries, it can be split into categories 
> (GSOC, refactoring, bugfixing etc.) but I think the more information the 
> better.
> 
>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Paweł Paprota<ppawel at fastmail.fm>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> On 07/03/2011 10:58 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
>>>> Just a quick "yes, please" from me. I think this is a very good idea and
>>>> I would gladly track my tasks on such a page, link other information to
>>>> it and blog about it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Good to hear!
>>>
>>>> Would you take the task of finishing this page? Maybe add a big fat
>>>> Nepomuk logo on top? ;)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sure. The problem is that I don't actually know what tasks are being
>>> worked on currently! This was in fact the main reason for starting the
>>> tracking page.
>>>
>>> Moreover, the core of this idea is that the tracking will be done
>>> collectively so nothing's stopping anyone from updating the status.
>>>
>>> I still have a few ideas on how to improve the shape and form of the
>>> page itself but obviously further suggestions are welcome.
>>>
>>> So basically to answer your question once again - yes and what else
>>> would you like to see there?
>>>
>>> Paweł
>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Sebastian
>>>>
>>>> On 07/03/2011 09:34 AM, Paweł Paprota wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> as I'm about to start another development task in the Nepomuk project,
>>>>> an idea came to my mind. I already said random things on IRC about using
>>>>> Bugzilla for tracking development but I've decided to give this idea a
>>>>> proper shape.
>>>>>
>>>>> So here is the first iteration:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/DevelopmentStatus
>>>>>
>>>>> There is enough introductory information on the page that I think
>>>>> there's no need to duplicate the explanation of the idea in this e-mail.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know what you think and if it would be feasible to try to
>>>>> maintain this page and see how it works (or doesn't work).
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Nepomuk mailing list
>>>> Nepomuk at kde.org
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nepomuk mailing list
>>> Nepomuk at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nepomuk mailing list
>> Nepomuk at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk